
Art
Hannah Hallermann
5 October 2026
Art
Hannah Hallermann
5 October 2026
Q: You call your sculptures “Tools for Social Transformation.” A tool implies function, a sculpture implies contemplation. By calling your work tools, are you asking something of the viewer that art usually doesn’t?
A: Ahhh, interesting — because I actually think sculpture contains function, and tools invite contemplation too. Every tool asks: How are you going to use me? You can use a hammer to build something — or to smash someone’s head in. For me, it’s not function versus contemplation. I’m interested in the space between the two: the moment when intention becomes action, and an object makes us aware of our own agency.
Q: How do you choose your materials, and what does each one carry into the work before you’ve even started?
A: It can go both ways. Sometimes there’s an idea first and I search for the material, sometimes the material starts the conversation. I think of material as a partner. It has its own language, its own character and its own limits — a bit like a relationship. At some point it might simply say: Nope, I’m not going to do that. Then the interesting part begins: do you force it, give up, or stay with the trouble and negotiate another way forward? That’s often where the magic lies.


Q: You often talk about failure as an essential part of moving forward. Has there been a mistake or unexpected outcome in your practice that ended up changing the way you work?
A: Failure as an artist isn’t a one-time event I could point to. It’s a constant companion. It’s an open secret: being able to fail is basically the number one skill of being an artist. Things collapse, get rejected, turn out differently than you imagined. And sometimes it’s just shit.
"But then you keep working, you adjust, you change direction — and often you suddenly see something you couldn’t see before. That’s the part I find rewarding."



Q: Many of your works explore how people make decisions together. Do you think art can actually shape the way we act as a society, or is its influence more subtle and personal?
A: Well, let’s fucking hope so. To me, the personal and the political go hand in hand. And I think art occupies a strange and useful space: it’s taken seriously enough for people to spend time with an idea, but free enough to test the ground — to try out things that might be too radical, too uncertain or too strange somewhere else.
Q: Which artist has influenced and informed your vision the most, and why?
A: That has changed a lot over my life — but of course there are satellites I keep returning to. If I had to pick one, I’d probably still drag good old Beuys into the room. I suspect his dogmatism would have driven me crazy, but I still love the idea that art happens between us — and that an object, a sculpture, a film, whatever the medium, can simply be a transmitter for dialogue and exchange.


Q: What challenges are facing artists in Berlin right now?
A: Their own minds. That’s not Berlin specific though It seems to me that we’ve become very quick at reducing complex questions to opposing sides — calling people out rather than calling them up, in short cancel culture. Art, to me, is a lived contradicton. Choosing a side is fairly easy. Staying in conversation while things remain complex is much harder — and much more interesting.



Q: Which places in Berlin do you keep returning to?
A: My self-built studio, which I made together with my partner, Livius from Studio Livius. We took some courage and built it in the midst of all this uncertainty — and made it modular and mobile: a studio that can adapt to uncertain times, uncertain contracts, and whatever comes next. And I keep returning to the canal. Somehow, water makes ideas arrive differently.



